(Continued from last Wednesday, September 25 . . . )
In the beginning of my draconian
rule of the seventh-grade classroom in Omaha, five students spent time after
school trying to subtract and get to 0.
For the next two or three weeks,
five or more had to stay and work until they’d done the subtraction correctly
throughout the entire problem. As I said last week, this process sometimes took
two hours.
As
the days passed, fewer and fewer checkmarks went on the chalkboard. Ron held
out for two or three weeks and had to stay after school each day. Led by him,
Bill and John also had to stay for they followed his example and disrupted class
when he did or disrupted it on their own and looked to him for approval. All
three always had several ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔after their names.
But
once Ron decided he’d had enough of this, he settled into brooding silence—like
Heathcliff on the moors. He had a good brain and somewhat infrequently would
offer an answer in class. His buddies would look at him admiringly and he’d
preen. But when I complimented him on something he’d done or said, he seemed
appreciative. I wasn’t letting him bully me and I think he developed a grudging
respect for me.
Laurence Olivier as Heathcliff
in the 1939 film version of Wuthering Heights.
The
surprising event to me was that no parents called or visited me to object to their son or daughter staying after school.
In mid-March a couple did come to the
convent one evening to demand that I change their daughter’s grades. Pam had taken
her 3rd quarter report card home that afternoon and her parents insisted
I had a grudge against their daughter because she was smarter than I.
For
the first two quarters of the school years Pam had gotten straight As. I’d
given her Bs and Cs because she'd done sloppy and incomplete work. She seemed to think that the assignments I gave were too juvenile. She was a ringleader of the girls, but
she didn’t get checkmarks. She was too intelligent for that. Her resistance
came in the form of inflections and facial expressions when she answered or asked a question.
Pam’s
parents simply couldn’t understand why her grades had gone down, and when I told
them about her attitude, they expressed their belief that she was smarter. More
attractive. More charming than any of the girls in her classroom. For all that,
they thought, she should be given As.
I
assured Pam’s parents that if her work and attitude changed for the last
quarter, she’d make better grades. I’d become steely by then and her parents
seemed to recognize that the grades would remain as given. They left angry, but
Pam began to respond to class questions without disdain and arrogance. She was
an attractive girl and she and Ron were a couple.
Sister
Mary Norbert, who’d been at St. Peter and Paul’s Grade School for several
years, had taught many of these seventh graders in her fifth-grade class two
years before.
One
day she said to me, “You know, Sister Innocence, that lot’s not innocent. They
haven’t been since they started carousing. Partying in the fifth grade. They
changed then. And not for the good.”
Seeing
my befuddlement, she whispered, “Sex.”
The
next day I looked out upon that sea of fifty-five students and felt sad for
them. I could see now why several of the girls seemed too mature for their age.
Too knowledgeable. Why they stood on the playground with hips and chest stuck
out provocatively. Why they looked at the boys with their mouths open while running the tip of their tongue over their lips.
I
knew that with regard to their sexuality they probably had experienced more
than I. Yet that fact wasn’t important. I was there to teach them; they
were there to learn.
From
February 15 to the end of the school year, I was perhaps more creative in my
teaching than in any of the subsequent years. The students’ passivity and
boredom became a challenge. Next week I hope to share with you some of the
projects with which I captured their attention.
(
. . . continued next Wednesday, October 9.)
Photographs from Wikipedia.








